Implement Unit Testing for fancymath #8

Merged
TimDiller merged 17 commits from unit_tests into main 2025-10-24 17:10:59 +00:00
6 changed files with 106 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ def fact(n: int) -> int:
return n * fact(n - 1) return n * fact(n - 1)
def is_even(x):
return x % 2 == 0
def is_odd(x):
return x % 2 == 1
if __name__ == '__main__': if __name__ == '__main__':
n = 5 n = 5
assert fact(n) == 120 assert fact(n) == 120

View File

@@ -30,6 +30,20 @@ class Vector(object):
s = "Vector(x=%s, y=%s, z=%s)" % (self.x, self.y, self.z) s = "Vector(x=%s, y=%s, z=%s)" % (self.x, self.y, self.z)
return s return s
def __add__(self, other):
Review

This should handle case where other is not a Vector.

This should handle case where `other` is not a `Vector`.
x = self.x + other.x
y = self.y + other.y
z = self.z + other.z
return self.__class__(x, y, z)
def __mul__(self, other):
if not isinstance(other, Vector):
Review

Do we want to handle scalar multiplication here? If so we should implement __rmul__ and __imul__.

Do we want to handle scalar multiplication here? If so we should implement `__rmul__` and `__imul__`.
return NotImplemented
x = self.y * other.z - self.z * other.y
y = self.z * other.x - self.x * other.z
z = self.x * other.y - self.y * other.x
return self.__class__(x, y, z)
if __name__ == "__main__": if __name__ == "__main__":
v1 = Vector(3, 4, 0) v1 = Vector(3, 4, 0)

0
test/__init__.py Normal file
View File

25
test/test_math.py Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
import unittest
from fancymath.math import is_even, is_odd
class TestMath(unittest.TestCase):
def test_is_even(self):
"Test the is_even function"
self.assertTrue(is_even(2))
self.assertTrue(is_even(-4))
self.assertTrue(is_even(0))
self.assertFalse(is_even(1))
self.assertFalse(is_even(2.5))
def test_is_odd(self):
"Test the is_odd function"
self.assertTrue(is_odd(3))
self.assertTrue(is_odd(-5))
self.assertFalse(is_odd(0))
self.assertFalse(is_odd(2))
self.assertFalse(is_odd(2.5))
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()

0
test/test_util.py Normal file
View File

59
test/test_vector.py Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
import unittest
from fancymath.vector import Vector
class TestVector(unittest.TestCase):
def test_cross_product(self):
# Dictionary of (v1, v2): v3
values = {
(Vector(1, 2, 3), Vector(3, 2, 1)): Vector(-4, 8, -4),
(Vector(0, 0, 0), Vector(1, 2, 3)): Vector(0, 0, 0),
(Vector(1, 0, 0), Vector(1, 0, 0)): Vector(0, 0, 0),
}
for inputs, expected in values.items():
v1, v2 = inputs
with self.subTest(v1=v1, v2=v2):
v3 = v1 * v2
self.assertIsInstance(v3, Vector)
self.assertEqual(v3.x, expected.x)
self.assertEqual(v3.y, expected.y)
self.assertEqual(v3.z, expected.z)
def test_cross_product_failure(self):
v1 = Vector(1, 2, 3)
v2 = (3, 2, 1)
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
v1 * v2
def test_add_vector(self):
v1 = Vector(1, 2, 3)
v2 = Vector(-3, -2, -1)
v3 = v1 + v2
self.assertIsInstance(v3, Vector)
self.assertEqual(v3.x, v1.x + v2.x)
def test_abs(self):
v1 = Vector(0, 0, 0)
v2 = Vector(1, 2, 2)
v3 = Vector(1, -2, 2)
self.assertEqual(v1.abs(), 0)
self.assertEqual(v2.abs(), 3)
self.assertEqual(v2.abs(), v3.abs())
def test_dot_failure(self):
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
v1 = Vector(1, 2, 3)
v1.dot(3)
def test_dot_product(self):
v1 = Vector(1, 2, 3)
v2 = Vector(-3, -2, -1)
v3 = v1.dot(v2)
Review

Seeing this in use, perhaps we should use @ for dot product? So we get v1 @ v2. Can we open an issue to discuss this?

Seeing this in use, perhaps we should use `@` for dot product? So we get `v1 @ v2`. Can we open an issue to discuss this?
self.assertEqual(v3,v1.x * v2.x + v1.y * v2.y + v1.z * v2.z)
vzero = Vector(0, 0, 0)
self.assertEqual(v1.dot(vzero),0)