Block a user
Implement Unit Testing for
fancymath
This looks pretty good. We should have type checking on other in the __add__ method and a few more docstrings would be good. Beyond that there are some design issues to consider, but they may not need to be part of this PR.
Implement Unit Testing for
fancymath
Do we want to handle scalar multiplication here? If so we should implement __rmul__ and __imul__.
Implement Unit Testing for
fancymath
Seeing this in use, perhaps we should use @ for dot product? So we get v1 @ v2. Can we open an issue to discuss this?
Add subtests for test_cross_product.
corran
pushed to test/vector-cross-subtests at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-24 15:55:19 +00:00
corran
created branch test/vector-cross-subtests in DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-24 15:55:19 +00:00
corran
pushed to enh/cross-product at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-24 15:22:27 +00:00
Add cross-product and tests
corran
pushed to enh/cross-product at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-24 15:13:53 +00:00
corran
created branch enh/cross-product in DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-24 15:13:53 +00:00
corran
pushed to typing-for-humans at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-22 16:52:47 +00:00
corran
pushed to typing-for-humans at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-22 16:14:22 +00:00
corran
pushed to typing-for-humans at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-22 15:41:36 +00:00
"Python Typing is for Humans" links
corran
pushed to typing-for-humans at DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-22 15:19:51 +00:00
corran
created branch typing-for-humans in DillerDigitalStud…/DD-SWNG-20251020-V
2025-10-22 15:19:51 +00:00